i got distracted AGAIN.
whoops.
gotta re- paint those fingernails.
would you rather be universally beautiful or totally accepted for who are and how you look?
answer: being universally beautiful.
what if people only see you for who you are because of your outward apperance? your personality doesnt matter as much anymore because your beauty makes up whatever flaws you have.
answer: totally accepted for who you are.
what if you weren't given the chance to get close enough to a person to share your inner most feelings simply because you're not as good looking as the other?
there has been an assumption where people judge people solely on how they look. rating someone's personality and heart with a single glance is just low. there is far more than beauty. far more.
an experiment was carried out not long ago. a girl will drop her books in the middle of the street, and we'll see what happens next. they used girls who were classified as beautiful to girls classified as ugly. guys rushed to help the 'beautiful' girl. when it was the 'ugly', fat girl, people passed her by just as if she was invisible. they came to conclusion that your outward apperance may also affect how others treat you.
being accepted because you are beautiful. being left out because you are not as beautiful. do we all have to be beautiful and exactly the same to be accepted? which one matters most? inside or outside?
the real question is "who are we to say what beautiful is?"
is 'beautiful' what majority admires? or is 'beautiful' what you solely love?
how do you personify 'beautiful'?
Comments for this post
All comments
